Categories: Zim Latest

High court declares “Losing candidate ” Dexter Nduna Chegutu West Zanu PF MP

The High court yesterday ruled in favour of a Zanu PF losing candidate for Chegutu West parliamentary seat Dexter Nduna, who was wrongly announced winner by ZEC in July harmonised elections.

According to law Zec’s announcement which ruled in favour of Nduna against MDC’s Trust Konjana could only be reversed by the electoral court despite Zec admitting the anomaly.

The electoral court declared Dexter Nduna as the winner and duly elected MP of Chegutu West parliamentary seat. Konjani’s case being dismissed with costs, according to the court.

Nduna was arguing the Electoral Court does not have the jurisdictional ability to nullify a declaration made by the electoral body and thereafter pronounce an alternative winner.

Zec had initially announced Nduna as the winner with 10 932 votes, and Konjana with 10 828 votes, before the latter challenged the result, claiming Zec mixed up the figures. But while Zec reportedly admitted to have made an error, the electoral body advised Konjana that the results could only be overturned by the Electoral Court.

Konjana then filed a petition with the Electoral Court in Harare seeking the nullification of Nduna’s declaration, adding a tabulation error occurred and prejudiced him of 120 votes that had been erroneously awarded to one Simon Kache of UCADPGPZ.

“The relief the petitioner (Konjana) seeks is irregular in that it is not contemplated by Statute. Firstly, the petitioner predicates his cause on section 66 (4) (a) of the Electoral Act. Under such provision the Electoral Court only has power to “set aside” a declaration and go no further. Under this provision the said court cannot “nullify” a declaration and thereafter pronounce an alternative winner as prayed for by the petitioner. This is incompetent relief,” Nduna said.

“In terms of section 66 (4) (c) as read with section 67A of the Electoral Act, this court only has power to declare another candidate the winner of an election after a recount of votes. The petitioner is therefore asking the court to exercise powers beyond the jurisdictional ability of the statutory provision he seeks to rely on. An exercise power beyond the jurisdictional ability of a court is irregular and void ad initio….”

Besides the jurisdictional ability of the Electoral Court, Nduna further said Konjana’s petition was afflicted with a myriad of procedural irregularities and therefore urged the court to dismiss it.

Nduna had two cases before the courts and now awaits the verdict of the other one of discharging a firearm during Zanu PF internal elections at Chinengundu Primary School in Chegutu.

Share

Recent Posts

Our teachers were ‘poorly’ trained to administer CALA, gvt

The Minister of Primary and Secondary Education Torerai Moyo has explained the rationale behind revising… Read More

29th February 2024

Hwindi killed in $3 sex game gone wrong with passenger

A 37-YEAR-OLD tout from Birchenough Bridge died during sex with a passenger who did not… Read More

29th February 2024

The thrill of the chase: Sports betting in Ethiopia

Sports betting in Ethiopia is more than a pastime—it's a passion that captures the essence… Read More

29th February 2024

ZBC CEO suspended

The Board of Directors of the Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation has suspended the corporation’s Chief Executive… Read More

28th February 2024

Gvt tells journalists how to report on Gukurahundi hearings

The government through the Zimbabwe Media Commission (ZMC) has produced the "Gukurahundi Code of Conduct… Read More

28th February 2024

Virtual court hearings unconstitutional, Zim not ready for paperless court sessions- PLC report

In August last year the High Court Rules were amended by SI 153/2023 to allow… Read More

28th February 2024